1060 Vs 1660 Ti Mobile
Price at present 281$ Games supported 96% Price now 682$ Games supported 96% Comparison of graphics bill of fare compages, market segment, value for coin and other general parameters. Value for money To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices. General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you accept to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards tin well exceed their nominal TDP, peculiarly when overclocked. Data on GeForce GTX 1060 vi GB and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it'due south interface and motorbus (motherboard compatibility), boosted power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it'due south notebook size, connection slot and coach, if the video bill of fare is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard. Parameters of retentivity installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of arrangement RAM. Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. Equally a rule, data in this department is precise only for desktop reference ones (and so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA fries). OEM manufacturers may change the number and blazon of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes. APIs supported, including item versions of those APIs. Not-gaming benchmark functioning comparison. Note that overall benchmark functioning is measured in points in 0-100 range. This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, just if you observe some perceived inconsistencies, experience gratuitous to speak upwardly in comments department, we ordinarily fix problems speedily. This is probably the nearly ubiquitous criterion, function of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing iv dissever benchmarks for Direct3D versions nine, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being washed in 4K resolution if possible), and few more than tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% 3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. Information technology taxes the graphics carte du jour with ii scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a bounding main cavern, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a caught planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to exist used instead. Benchmark coverage: 17% 3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. Information technology used four tests based on 2 scenes, ane beingness few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken transport, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite beingness done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy. Criterion coverage: 16% Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird infinite teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Merely like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 13% Criterion coverage: 13% Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight betwixt a humanoid and a fiery fauna seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Burn down Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Criterion coverage: 13% Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Water ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level ix to display a boxing betwixt 2 space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, information technology is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 8% Benchmark coverage: 2% Let'south see how skillful the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Hither are the average frames per second in a big ready of popular games across dissimilar resolutions: −11.i% +eleven.1% −94.1% +94.1% −iv.7% +four.7% −33.3% +33.3% −100% +100% −13.four% +13.iv% −8.6% +8.6% −34% +34% −241% +241% −144% +144% −37.5% +37.5% −22.1% +22.1% −141% +141% −13.one% +xiii.one% −44.1% +44.ane% −nineteen.viii% +19.8% −35.9% +35.9% −58.8% +58.8% −18.7% +xviii.7% −13.three% +13.3% −34.four% +34.4% −179% +179% −91.ii% +91.2% −25.6% +25.6% −36.vii% +36.7% −25.9% +25.nine% −35.5% +35.5% −109% +109% −39.5% +39.5% −23.five% +23.5% −twenty.five% +xx.5% −52.nine% +52.9% −xviii.half dozen% +eighteen.6% −x.1% +10.1% −35.vi% +35.6% −25% +25% +3% −3% −43.9% +43.9% −73.five% +73.5% −26.5% +26.5% −15.iv% +15.four% −36.8% +36.8% −35.3% +35.3% −12.5% +12.5% +half-dozen.3% −half-dozen.3% −19% +xix% +36% −36% −27.7% +27.7% −20% +20% +67.half-dozen% −67.6% +47.8% −47.eight% −50% +50% +9.7% −ix.7% +47.viii% −47.viii% −18.8% +18.8% −41.vii% +41.7% −41.2% +41.ii% −20.vii% +20.7% −22.2% +22.2% +162% −162% −22.6% +22.six% +240% −240% −34.8% +34.8% −23.1% +23.i% +xi.8% −11.viii% +162% −162% Technical City couldn't decide betwixt NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 half-dozen GB and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile The differences in operation seem likewise modest. Be aware that GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is a notebook ane. Should yous however take questions concerning pick between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and nosotros shall respond. Do you lot remember we are right or mistaken in our option? Vote past clicking "Similar" button about your favorite graphics card. We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 1060 half-dozen GB from AMD is Radeon R9 FURY X, which is slower by ane% and lower by v positions in our rating. Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB: We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile from AMD is Radeon RX 6600M, which is nearly equal in speed and is lower by 1 position in our rating. Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile: We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with functioning more than or less shut to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. Here y'all can see the user rating of the graphics cards, too as charge per unit them yourself. Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB on a calibration of 1 to 5: Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5: Here yous can enquire a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. Graphics settings Screen resolution FPS1060 half dozen GB vs 1660 Ti Mobile
General info
Place in functioning rating 127 129 Value for money 42.04 23.96 Architecture Pascal (2016−2021) Turing (2018−2021) GPU code proper name GP106 N18E-G0 Market segment Desktop Laptop Release date 19 July 2016 (v years ago) 23 April 2019 (3 years ago) Launch toll (MSRP) $299 $229 Price at present $281 (0.9x MSRP) $682 (3x MSRP) Technical specs
Pipelines / CUDA cores 1280 no data Core clock speed 1506 MHz no information Boost clock speed 1708 MHz no information Number of transistors 4,400 meg 6,600 million Manufacturing process technology sixteen nm 12 nm Thermal design power (TDP) 120 Watt no information Texture fill rate 136.7 152.6 Floating-point performance four,375 gflops no data Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Laptop size no data medium sized Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe three.0 x16 Length 250 mm no data Width 2-slot no data Supplementary ability connectors 1x 6-pin no data Memory
Memory type GDDR5 no information Maximum RAM amount 6 GB no data Memory omnibus width 192 Bit no data Memory clock speed 8000 MHz no data Retentiveness bandwidth 192.2 GB/s no data Shared memory - - Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort no information HDMI + no data G-SYNC support + no data Technologies
API support
DirectX 12 (12_1) no data Shader Model 6.iv vi.5 OpenGL iv.6 no data OpenCL ane.ii no data Vulkan 1.2.131 ane.ii.131 CUDA 6.1 7.v Criterion performance
Overall score
Gaming functioning
Full HD 93 97 1440p 49 58 4K 32 35 Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 86 Full Hard disk
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 72 80 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35 66 Battlefield 5 106 111 Telephone call of Duty: Modern Warfare 78 104 Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 68 Far Cry 5 82 93 Far Cry New Dawn 81 88 Forza Horizon iv 100 134 Hitman three xxx−35 116 Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35 83 Scarlet Dead Redemption ii 56 77 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 68 83 Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35 82 Total Hard disk
High Preset
Assassinator'southward Creed Odyssey 61 69 Assassin's Creed Valhalla xxx−35 49 Battlefield five 86 103 Phone call of Duty: Modern Warfare 64 87 Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 54 Far Cry 5 75 89 Far Cry New Dawn 75 85 Forza Horizon 4 93 125 Hitman 3 30−35 95 Horizon Zero Dawn thirty−35 65 Metro Exodus 43 54 Red Expressionless Redemption 2 30 41 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 58 73 The Witcher iii: Wild Hunt 76 103 Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35 71 Full Hard disk drive
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 38 53 Assassin'due south Creed Valhalla xxx−35 42 Battleground v 78 94 Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 52 Far Cry 5 70 83 Far Cry New Dawn 69 76 Forza Horizon four 73 99 The Witcher three: Wild Chase 44 55 Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35 33 1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 41 59 Hitman iii thirty−35 59 Horizon Aught Dawn thirty−35 43 Metro Exodus 26 30 Red Dead Redemption 2 xix 26 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 34 46 1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassinator's Creed Odyssey 32 36 Assassin's Creed Valhalla thirty−35 32 Battlefield v 58 69 Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 25 Far Weep 5 47 60 Far Cry New Dawn 50 lx Forza Horizon four 57 30−35 Sentinel Dogs: Legion 30−35 23 4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 22 33 Hitman 3 thirty−35 31 Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35 23 Metro Exodus 16 19 Red Dead Redemption 2 12 17 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17 24 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29 35 4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin'southward Creed Odyssey 18 22 Assassinator'due south Creed Valhalla 30−35 13 Battlefield five 31 38 Cyberpunk 2077 thirty−35 10 Far Weep 5 23 31 Far Cry New Dawn 26 32 Forza Horizon four 38 30−35 Watch Dogs: Legion thirty−35 13 Advantages and disadvantages
Performance rating 34.56 34.thirty Novelty 19 July 2016 23 April 2019 Price $299 $229 Fleck lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Bandage your vote
Competitors of GeForce GTX 1060 half-dozen GB by AMD
Competitors of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile by AMD
Similar GPU comparisons
User rating
Questions and comments
Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-GTX-1060-6-GB-vs-GeForce-GTX-1660-Ti-mobile
0 Response to "1060 Vs 1660 Ti Mobile"
Post a Comment