1060 Vs 1660 Ti Mobile
1060 half dozen GB vs 1660 Ti Mobile
Price at present 281$
Games supported 96%
Price now 682$
Games supported 96%
General info
Comparison of graphics bill of fare compages, market segment, value for coin and other general parameters.
| Place in functioning rating | 127 | 129 |
| Value for money | 42.04 | 23.96 |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | Turing (2018−2021) |
| GPU code proper name | GP106 | N18E-G0 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 19 July 2016 (v years ago) | 23 April 2019 (3 years ago) |
| Launch toll (MSRP) | $299 | $229 |
| Price at present | $281 (0.9x MSRP) | $682 (3x MSRP) |
Value for money
To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you accept to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards tin well exceed their nominal TDP, peculiarly when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1280 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | no information |
| Boost clock speed | 1708 MHz | no information |
| Number of transistors | 4,400 meg | 6,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | sixteen nm | 12 nm |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 120 Watt | no information |
| Texture fill rate | 136.7 | 152.6 |
| Floating-point performance | four,375 gflops | no data |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Data on GeForce GTX 1060 vi GB and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it'due south interface and motorbus (motherboard compatibility), boosted power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it'due south notebook size, connection slot and coach, if the video bill of fare is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe three.0 x16 |
| Length | 250 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary ability connectors | 1x 6-pin | no data |
Memory
Parameters of retentivity installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of arrangement RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | no information |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | no data |
| Memory omnibus width | 192 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | no data |
| Retentiveness bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. Equally a rule, data in this department is precise only for desktop reference ones (and so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA fries). OEM manufacturers may change the number and blazon of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | no information |
| HDMI | + | no data |
| G-SYNC support | + | no data |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
API support
APIs supported, including item versions of those APIs.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | no data |
| Shader Model | 6.iv | vi.5 |
| OpenGL | iv.6 | no data |
| OpenCL | ane.ii | no data |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | ane.ii.131 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 7.v |
Criterion performance
Not-gaming benchmark functioning comparison. Note that overall benchmark functioning is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, just if you observe some perceived inconsistencies, experience gratuitous to speak upwardly in comments department, we ordinarily fix problems speedily.
- Passmark
- 3DMark Vantage Operation
- 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
- 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
- 3DMark Fire Strike Score
- 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
- 3DMark Water ice Tempest GPU
- SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase
This is probably the nearly ubiquitous criterion, function of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing iv dissever benchmarks for Direct3D versions nine, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being washed in 4K resolution if possible), and few more than tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. Information technology taxes the graphics carte du jour with ii scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a bounding main cavern, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a caught planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to exist used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. Information technology used four tests based on 2 scenes, ane beingness few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken transport, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite beingness done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Criterion coverage: 16%
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird infinite teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Merely like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
Criterion coverage: 13%
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight betwixt a humanoid and a fiery fauna seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Burn down Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Criterion coverage: 13%
Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Water ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level ix to display a boxing betwixt 2 space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, information technology is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.
Benchmark coverage: 8%
Benchmark coverage: 2%
Gaming functioning
Let'south see how skillful the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Hither are the average frames per second in a big ready of popular games across dissimilar resolutions:
| Full HD | 93 | 97 |
| 1440p | 49 | 58 |
| 4K | 32 | 35 |
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35 | 86 |
Full Hard disk
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 72 −11.i% | 80 +eleven.1% |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 30−35 −94.1% | 66 +94.1% |
| Battlefield 5 | 106 −iv.7% | 111 +four.7% |
| Telephone call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 78 −33.3% | 104 +33.3% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35 −100% | 68 +100% |
| Far Cry 5 | 82 −13.four% | 93 +13.iv% |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 81 −8.6% | 88 +8.6% |
| Forza Horizon iv | 100 −34% | 134 +34% |
| Hitman three | xxx−35 −241% | 116 +241% |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 30−35 −144% | 83 +144% |
| Scarlet Dead Redemption ii | 56 −37.5% | 77 +37.5% |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 68 −22.1% | 83 +22.1% |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−35 −141% | 82 +141% |
Total Hard disk
High Preset
| Assassinator'southward Creed Odyssey | 61 −13.one% | 69 +xiii.one% |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | xxx−35 −44.1% | 49 +44.ane% |
| Battlefield five | 86 −nineteen.viii% | 103 +19.8% |
| Phone call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 64 −35.9% | 87 +35.9% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35 −58.8% | 54 +58.8% |
| Far Cry 5 | 75 −18.7% | 89 +xviii.7% |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 75 −13.three% | 85 +13.3% |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 93 −34.four% | 125 +34.4% |
| Hitman 3 | 30−35 −179% | 95 +179% |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | thirty−35 −91.ii% | 65 +91.2% |
| Metro Exodus | 43 −25.6% | 54 +25.6% |
| Red Expressionless Redemption 2 | 30 −36.vii% | 41 +36.7% |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 58 −25.9% | 73 +25.nine% |
| The Witcher iii: Wild Hunt | 76 −35.5% | 103 +35.5% |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−35 −109% | 71 +109% |
Full Hard disk drive
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 38 −39.5% | 53 +39.5% |
| Assassin'due south Creed Valhalla | xxx−35 −23.five% | 42 +23.5% |
| Battleground v | 78 −twenty.five% | 94 +xx.5% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35 −52.nine% | 52 +52.9% |
| Far Cry 5 | 70 −xviii.half dozen% | 83 +eighteen.6% |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 69 −x.1% | 76 +10.1% |
| Forza Horizon four | 73 −35.vi% | 99 +35.6% |
| The Witcher three: Wild Chase | 44 −25% | 55 +25% |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−35 +3% | 33 −3% |
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 41 −43.9% | 59 +43.9% |
| Hitman iii | thirty−35 −73.five% | 59 +73.5% |
| Horizon Aught Dawn | thirty−35 −26.5% | 43 +26.5% |
| Metro Exodus | 26 −15.iv% | 30 +15.four% |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | xix −36.8% | 26 +36.8% |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 34 −35.3% | 46 +35.3% |
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassinator's Creed Odyssey | 32 −12.5% | 36 +12.5% |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | thirty−35 +half-dozen.3% | 32 −half-dozen.3% |
| Battlefield v | 58 −19% | 69 +xix% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35 +36% | 25 −36% |
| Far Weep 5 | 47 −27.7% | 60 +27.7% |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 50 −20% | lx +20% |
| Forza Horizon four | 57 +67.half-dozen% | 30−35 −67.6% |
| Sentinel Dogs: Legion | 30−35 +47.8% | 23 −47.eight% |
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 22 −50% | 33 +50% |
| Hitman 3 | thirty−35 +9.7% | 31 −ix.7% |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 30−35 +47.viii% | 23 −47.viii% |
| Metro Exodus | 16 −18.8% | 19 +18.8% |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 12 −41.vii% | 17 +41.7% |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 17 −41.2% | 24 +41.ii% |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 29 −20.vii% | 35 +20.7% |
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin'southward Creed Odyssey | 18 −22.2% | 22 +22.2% |
| Assassinator'due south Creed Valhalla | 30−35 +162% | 13 −162% |
| Battlefield five | 31 −22.6% | 38 +22.six% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | thirty−35 +240% | 10 −240% |
| Far Weep 5 | 23 −34.8% | 31 +34.8% |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 26 −23.1% | 32 +23.i% |
| Forza Horizon four | 38 +xi.8% | 30−35 −11.viii% |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | thirty−35 +162% | 13 −162% |
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance rating | 34.56 | 34.thirty |
| Novelty | 19 July 2016 | 23 April 2019 |
| Price | $299 | $229 |
| Fleck lithography | 16 nm | 12 nm |
Technical City couldn't decide betwixt
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 half-dozen GB
and
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
The differences in operation seem likewise modest.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is a notebook ane.
Should yous however take questions concerning pick between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and nosotros shall respond.
Bandage your vote
Do you lot remember we are right or mistaken in our option? Vote past clicking "Similar" button about your favorite graphics card.
Competitors of GeForce GTX 1060 half-dozen GB by AMD
We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 1060 half-dozen GB from AMD is Radeon R9 FURY X, which is slower by ane% and lower by v positions in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB:
Competitors of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile by AMD
We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile from AMD is Radeon RX 6600M, which is nearly equal in speed and is lower by 1 position in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile:
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with functioning more than or less shut to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
User rating
Here y'all can see the user rating of the graphics cards, too as charge per unit them yourself.
Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB on a calibration of 1 to 5:
Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:
Questions and comments
Here yous can enquire a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Graphics settings
Screen resolution
FPS
Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-GTX-1060-6-GB-vs-GeForce-GTX-1660-Ti-mobile
0 Response to "1060 Vs 1660 Ti Mobile"
Post a Comment